Peace Studies Program
Towards a Culture of Peace
An immersive experience where students spend time with the filmmaker to reflect on the three guiding questions in the film and work together to find positive, action-oriented solutions for today’s challenges, transcending politics and cliché responses. We draw from the wisdom of film participants in their areas of expertise: psychology, philosophy, law, human rights and constructive activism.
-
We begin where the film begins — with the question itself. Students break into small groups to reflect and arrive at their own definitions of peace, then share them with the larger group.
We then watch how participants in the film answer the same question, drawing from their backgrounds in psychology, philosophy, law, human rights, and activism.
The contrast between what students expect and what they hear opens the conversation in ways that are hard to anticipate and impossible to manufacture.
-
This question is explored through structured debate. Two groups — assigned randomly — are each asked to defend one position: just war theory or absolute pacifism.
After the debate, the exercise shifts: rather than declaring a winner, both groups identify what they actually have in common.
From there we introduce three foundational concepts from peace studies — negative vs. positive peace, the triangle of violence, and conflict transformation — tools that reframe the question and open new ways of thinking.
-
Students watch Part III of the film — The Call to Act — and encounter peace heroes whose work spans continents and disciplines.
We close with practical possibilities: organizations students can support, programs they can join, and actions they can take.
Expanded horizons may lead to capstone projects, exchange programs, community involvement, and a sense that positive action is within reach.
Our Process
Purpose
We begin by setting intentions. Students and facilitator agree on what this time is for: not to win an argument or arrive at a predetermined conclusion, but to think carefully, listen generously, and leave with a clearer sense of the world and their place in it.
Civil Dialogue Agreement
Before the conversation begins, students create the conditions for it. Together they agree on how they will listen and speak to one another — what respectful disagreement looks like, what it means to truly hear a view different from your own.
Open Discussion
There is no dogma here and no single correct answer. We approach each question with curiosity and an open mind, practicing active listening and fact-based critical thinking. Every voice in the room is a source of insight. The goal is not consensus but clarity.
Action
Students leave with concrete possibilities — organizations to support, programs to join, actions to take. Peace building is not reserved for diplomats and heads of state. It begins with informed, motivated young people who know where to start.